You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
The case against the case against reopening schools
AP

The case against the case against reopening schools

  • Updated
  • 0
Only $5 for 5 months

As coronavirus cases continue to rise, more public school systems are announcing they will reopen only online _ even when faced with direct and intense public pressure from President Donald Trump.

So much enters the calculus for K-12 school reopenings, from the health dangers to the value of education to the disparate impacts and imperfections of online education. While there is no single right answer for all districts, consider this a nudge in the direction of reopening.

First and most important, there is a distinction between children spreading the virus and children spreading the virus through school activities. The case against a physical reopening rests on the public health dangers, but the relevant question is relative.

Even if the schools do not physically reopen, children will still hang out together. This is especially true for teenagers, and they are also a group that, in a South Korean study, can readily spread the virus to others. Not many parents are going to quarantine their 15-year-olds at home for many months, much less their 17-year-olds. Recall that Romeo and Juliet were teenagers and came together as lovers against extreme parental opposition and during a time of plague.

No one likes to admit it, but one of the most important arguments for much of K-12 education is simply that it provides day care services for parents. Those services are essential not just for the smooth functioning of labor markets but for parental sanity as well. If schools can't even provide that day care, maybe they won't seem so necessary.

Many parents would prefer to keep their tax money and spend it on other educational opportunities, whether it's sending their children to charter schools, private schools, "pod" schools, or some hybrid arrangement. "Vouchers for just this year" might prove popular, again making the public schools look bad.

If the U.S. moved to such a regime, there would be many more decentralized decisions about under what terms the schools should reopen (and in fact some of these private alternatives will spring into place without vouchers). Among other things, that raises again the possibility of contagion through children regardless of whether public schools are open.

Of course many school reopenings will bring only partial attendance, as polls of parents indicate skepticism about in-person classes. The resulting greater physical space for social distancing, and more limited possibilities for contagion, will again make people wonder why the public schools are physically closed altogether, given that some parents really wish to send their children.

One cannot in good conscience argue that every district should reopen, given the potential for disaster. And in many cases there probably just isn't a correct moral answer as to whether school reopenings should proceed. Nonetheless, the arguments against the physical reopening of public schools are weaker than they at first appear. There is no way to truly protect children and their parents -- or the reputations of teachers and public schools.

Tyler Cowen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is a professor of economics at George Mason University and writes for the blog Marginal Revolution. H

Copyright 2020 Tribune Content Agency.

Concerned about COVID-19?

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

  • Updated

I’m almost ashamed to admit that I take great pleasure in reading about the annual Darwin Awards. Every year there’s a new crop of stories det…

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News